The Paget Papers.

Letter from the Hon. Arthur Paget (Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to the Court of Austria) to Lord St Helens.

Source: Paget, Right Hon. Sir Augustus B. Paget, G.C.B. The Paget Papers, Diplomatic and other Correspondence of the Right Hon Sir A. Paget. G.C.B., 1794-1807, 2 Vols. Longmans, Green and Co. New York 1896. Vol 2.  Pages 74 -76.


From the Hon. A. Paget to Lord Hawkesbury.

Vienna, 19 April 1803.

My Lord,-I mentioned in my last that the French Ambassador had informed His Imperial Majesty's Minister that his Government might perhaps find it necessary to call upon the Court of Vienna as one of the Guarantees of the order of Malta to interfere in the affairs pending between England & France, but that this intimation was to be considered as private & unofficial. I have since learnt from the Vice Chancellor that Mr. Champagny has desired to be informed of the Sense which this Court attaches to the Act of Accession to the 10th Art. of the Treaty of Amiens,* & that to this application He had replied that it was the Emperor's Intention to observe a strict Neutrality, that whenever any distinet proposition might be made to His I. My arising out of the accession He had given that He should be ready to answer to it. The act in question it was observed was in itself imperfect inasmuch as the acceptance of it had not been ratified by Gt Britain, & it was further remarked that the accession of other Great Powers to the first Article was still wanting.
Such is the statement which has been made to me by Ct Cobentzl of what has passed between himself & the French Ambassador.
The Declaration that "it was the Emperor's intention to observe a strict neutrality" seemed to me so wholly superfluous and unasked for by anything which had been stated to have been said by the French Ambassador, that I could not avoid observing to Ct Cobentzl that it had probably been made in answer to some other distinct & important overture which I had got to learn. From the explanation however he gave, as well as from the information I have received from other quarters, I am led to believe that what I have above related is the substance of what has hitherto been treated between them, that the result is not less ambiguous & inconclusive, & that the declaration in question was in fact a spontaneous & unguarded effusion of the Vice Chancellor's private sentiments.
Tho' I have always been in the habit of seeing Ct Cobentzl very constantly, the importance of the moment has naturally led me of late to visit him more frequently than usual, and it is lest your Lordship should suppose that the above expression (of which I have already said so much) might have been thrown out in reply to any observations I might at an time have made I think it my duty to state explicitly that I have been particularly cautious in never having allowed an expression to escape me which could by any means be construed into a wish of what is vulgarly denominated "drawing this Country into a War." Independent of higher considerations of duty, I have been silent upon principle. I wish not to tire yr Lp's patience by going into any length of reasoning upon this Subject. I will merely lay down one opinion, which is "that no overtures will be favourably listened to by this Government until they feel themselves exposed to some pressing danger, and that whenever that moment arrives, the overtures will come from hence."
I hear from a variety of quarters that the Archduke Charles† has lately held a very firm & honorable language in speaking of the important events of the moment, & I have no objection, as a testimony in favor of that officer, to acquaint yr Lp that General Meerfeldt is one of the Channels thro' which the information has reached me.
The Emperor has at length been induced to give His Ratification to the Plan of Indemnities, that is, to those points which were concluded at the epoch of the Convention signed at Paris last Decr;‡ the rest will remain a matter for future deliberation. . . .
In addition to the contents of Mr. Stratton's dispatches, I feel it incumbent upon me to inform yr Lp that it has come to me from very good authority that the French Ambassador at the Porte is very assiduously seconded in all his negociations by the Prussian Minister, in testimony of which the K. of Prussia has received the thanks of the French Government.-I have, &c.

(Signed) Arthur Paget.

* Signed in Vienna August 1802. Cf. pp. 55, 57, 58, 60.
† By his reformation of the army from 1802 to 1804, when he was war Minister, the Archduke prepared the way for a vigorous defence, but he steadily opposed offensive war or the provocation of war.
‡ Count Cobentzl, after a violent altercation with Talleyrand, yielded to the threats of the French Minister in signing the Convention.


COMMENT.


Created 27th April 2004

Back to the Paget Correspondance Index  Signpost RightDocument
LibrarySignpost Left To History Menu
To the Home Page
Signpost RightHome